When Rachel Reeves claims there will be "no return to austerity" under Labour, she's pretending that austerity is a thing that happened in the past, rather than an existing policy she wants to keep
TL;DR - Some terf was suspended by the Greens so now she's bad-mouthing the party ... At least, I think that's what it said. I got bored waiting for the article to make some kind of point beyond unsubstantiated claims.
A lot of anti green stuff knocking about especially when anything is discussed critical of the odious Starmer and his cronies? I am voting green as I did in the days of teflon tony and so are millions of others
Rachel Reeves is blethering again about how Labour can be trusted to avoid "unfunded commitments". Having its own sovereign currency, the UK can actually create all the money needed to rebuild this shattered society. Does she think we've forgotten how government created eyewateringly large "unfunded" sums of money overnight, to spend on bailing out irresponsible banks? Perhaps someone could remind Reeves that at no time during the Second World War did the government announce that the eyewatering costs of defending this island against Hitler had broken its fiscal rules, and that a halt must be called until the economy was stronger.
There was the cost of the pandemic also, how could that be afforded. She knows this is all nonsense in the hope people will buy into the 'competent Conservatives' idea. We'll see the outcome shortly. Good chess player though.
Yes, indeed, she lies about many things, except buttering up her capitalist chums. She is an entirely confected, plastic person, down to her curated appearance and silly repeated mantras. Seeing her alongside Starmer and Streeting is a horror movie.
Hey "Angry" ! Good points. And I suggest the Greens are no serious alternative to Labour. https://theleftlane2024.substack.com/p/the-sad-saga-of-sheffield-green-alison
TL;DR - Some terf was suspended by the Greens so now she's bad-mouthing the party ... At least, I think that's what it said. I got bored waiting for the article to make some kind of point beyond unsubstantiated claims.
A lot of anti green stuff knocking about especially when anything is discussed critical of the odious Starmer and his cronies? I am voting green as I did in the days of teflon tony and so are millions of others
Rachel Reeves is blethering again about how Labour can be trusted to avoid "unfunded commitments". Having its own sovereign currency, the UK can actually create all the money needed to rebuild this shattered society. Does she think we've forgotten how government created eyewateringly large "unfunded" sums of money overnight, to spend on bailing out irresponsible banks? Perhaps someone could remind Reeves that at no time during the Second World War did the government announce that the eyewatering costs of defending this island against Hitler had broken its fiscal rules, and that a halt must be called until the economy was stronger.
There was the cost of the pandemic also, how could that be afforded. She knows this is all nonsense in the hope people will buy into the 'competent Conservatives' idea. We'll see the outcome shortly. Good chess player though.
Yes, indeed, she lies about many things, except buttering up her capitalist chums. She is an entirely confected, plastic person, down to her curated appearance and silly repeated mantras. Seeing her alongside Starmer and Streeting is a horror movie.
I never trusted her. Fortunately, from now I am in a rearranged constituency, that she hasn't chosen to stand in! Pudsey - chuck her out!